<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking of discomfort&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian in hamburg</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>ian in hamburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>Good thing they didn&#039;t say Icy Roads hamper Gifting Season.  Remember when gift was just a noun?  Those were the days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing they didn&#8217;t say Icy Roads hamper Gifting Season.  Remember when gift was just a noun?  Those were the days&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9337</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9337</guid>
		<description>and my dictionary does include &quot;ain&#039;t&quot; but has this note on usage...

&quot;USAGE The use of ain&#039;t was widespread in the 18th century and is still perfectly normal in many dialects and informal contexts in both North America and Britain. Today, however, it does not form part of standard English and should not be used in formal contexts.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and my dictionary does include &#8220;ain&#8217;t&#8221; but has this note on usage&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;USAGE The use of ain&#8217;t was widespread in the 18th century and is still perfectly normal in many dialects and informal contexts in both North America and Britain. Today, however, it does not form part of standard English and should not be used in formal contexts.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9336</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9336</guid>
		<description>Its the Oxford American Dictionary. I refuse to burn books, as that has a long infamous history. I don&#039;t even think &quot;Going Rogue&quot; should be burned, just not read, or you might be impacted by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the Oxford American Dictionary. I refuse to burn books, as that has a long infamous history. I don&#8217;t even think &#8220;Going Rogue&#8221; should be burned, just not read, or you might be impacted by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie S. Quire</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie S. Quire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9333</guid>
		<description>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
IT CAN&#039;T BE SO! 

I have spent way too much time scouring online dictonaries to ENSURE &quot;impacted&quot; is not a word. 

Clare you must have the only copy. I&#039;m with Megan. Burn it immediately. Consider it your Christmas present to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.<br />
IT CAN&#8217;T BE SO! </p>
<p>I have spent way too much time scouring online dictonaries to ENSURE &#8220;impacted&#8221; is not a word. </p>
<p>Clare you must have the only copy. I&#8217;m with Megan. Burn it immediately. Consider it your Christmas present to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9332</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9332</guid>
		<description>Some dictionaries also include &quot;ain&#039;t&quot; as a word. That doesn&#039;t make it an acceptable and legitimate part of the language. Most of the time, what people really mean when they say &quot;impacted&quot; is &quot;affected&quot; - people are affected by grandiose plans, or those plans have an impact upon them. 

I have also recently noticed an inclination to drop tiny connector words in articles - instead of, for example, &quot;a couple of things&quot;, I keep seeing &quot;a couple things&quot; - I blame texting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some dictionaries also include &#8220;ain&#8217;t&#8221; as a word. That doesn&#8217;t make it an acceptable and legitimate part of the language. Most of the time, what people really mean when they say &#8220;impacted&#8221; is &#8220;affected&#8221; &#8211; people are affected by grandiose plans, or those plans have an impact upon them. </p>
<p>I have also recently noticed an inclination to drop tiny connector words in articles &#8211; instead of, for example, &#8220;a couple of things&#8221;, I keep seeing &#8220;a couple things&#8221; &#8211; I blame texting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FailedMommy</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>FailedMommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>I agree with Megan.  Clare - burn it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Megan.  Clare &#8211; burn it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9328</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9328</guid>
		<description>Your dictionary has been corrupted by the federal government. Throw it into the fireplace NOW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your dictionary has been corrupted by the federal government. Throw it into the fireplace NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279&#038;cpage=1#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snowcoveredhills.com/?p=4279#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>Language is a funny thing.  But according to my dictionary it doesn&#039;t appear as though they are wrong...

impacted &#124;imˈpaktid&#124;
adjective
1 chiefly Medicine pressed firmly together, in particular
• (of a tooth) wedged between another tooth and the jaw.
• (of a fractured bone) having the parts crushed together.
• (of feces) lodged in the intestine.
2 strongly affected by something : grandiose planning projects have had deleterious effects on impacted social groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Language is a funny thing.  But according to my dictionary it doesn&#8217;t appear as though they are wrong&#8230;</p>
<p>impacted |imˈpaktid|<br />
adjective<br />
1 chiefly Medicine pressed firmly together, in particular<br />
• (of a tooth) wedged between another tooth and the jaw.<br />
• (of a fractured bone) having the parts crushed together.<br />
• (of feces) lodged in the intestine.<br />
2 strongly affected by something : grandiose planning projects have had deleterious effects on impacted social groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
